|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
37
   |
Posted - 2012.12.22 22:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
they do excist I have seen them. (also read oher comments)
ground vehicles:
light: LAV
meduim: I saw a Crawler before, I also heard that mechs were planned but probly for DLC
heavy: tanks
air vehicles:
light: Fighters (I have plans allready to be a fighter pilot)
meduim: Dropship
heavy: probly gunship
I can`t wait to get to play in one of them. |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
37
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 22:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
no, 5 diffrent levels of piloting doesn`t mean 5 diffrent air vehicles, example:
piloting lv1 + Gallente (or other race) dropship lv1 = Gruemsnes
piloting lv 3 + Gallante dropship lv3 (or was it 5?) = Prometheus
piloting is the level of diffuctly a player can controll of an air vehicle while gallante (or other race) dropship (or other air craft) skill is the elvel of Dropship the Gallanet race entrusts your worth of piloting it...or its a permit or soemthing |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
37
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 23:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:I want Aircraft to cost a hell of a lot of ISK. I'm talking 3-5 mil.
whats your reasoning of that? you only know that they are in the full game, nothing else (correct) and 1-2 RPG shots should take down a standard (there shouldn`t be a militia fighter... should there?) we don`t even know if they use small missle/ blaster/ railgun turrets (1 per wing) we can easily assume they will, aswell as use propulsion, sensors, sheild boosters ETC but you shouldn`t be calling out costs for something that is geniraly unknown. |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
37
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 23:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tyler Hall wrote:Icy Tiger wrote:I want Aircraft to cost a hell of a lot of ISK. I'm talking 3-5 mil. Agreed. Aircraft should always be an expensive but effective role. good luck "balancing" that one CCP... 
I completly disigree, intill we know if its fast enough to out run rockets from a Swarm luancher (wich will most likely destroy it in 1-2 shots, we know its the strength of the LAV) and the cost of an Instalation wich will tear it apart like a LAV EXCAPT for the fact that the fighter has less cover (but might be faster and more easy to turn/dodge) AND the missle hybrid/large turret showed us that it had a lcok on feature like the sawrm luancher (chances are missles will be anti air guns inless it says dumb missle) ONCE we know more we could start talking balance. |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
37
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 23:45:00 -
[5] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Shouper of BHD wrote:Tyler Hall wrote:Icy Tiger wrote:I want Aircraft to cost a hell of a lot of ISK. I'm talking 3-5 mil. Agreed. Aircraft should always be an expensive but effective role. good luck "balancing" that one CCP... I completly disigree, intill we know if its fast enough to out run rockets from a Swarm luancher (wich will most likely destroy it in 1-2 shots, we know its the strength of the LAV) and the cost of an Instalation wich will tear it apart like a LAV EXCAPT for the fact that the fighter has less cover (but might be faster and more easy to turn/dodge) AND the missle hybrid/large turret showed us that it had a lcok on feature like the sawrm luancher (chances are missles will be anti air guns inless it says dumb missle) ONCE we know more we could start talking balance. Yep. I would bet fighters will be extremely squishy, but with very high maneuverability. Since they're only a huge threat to other aircraft, I doubt they'll need too much as far as balancing.
agreed except I`m guessing they are good tank destroyers/ HAV destroyers.... atleast 1 aircraft has to fill that role and dropship doesn`t seem like it does. |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
37
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 03:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Encharrion wrote:Personally I think the Fighters should run a large turret with a damage multiplier but faster overheating. Fighters move so fast that you need to be able to deal a large amount of damage in the short amount of time you can aim at them. The fast overheating means that they deal less damage in total, but they put out that damage in a much shorter time period. I'm mostly thinking about blaster turrets here, but railgun fighters would be interesting. I have no idea how missiles would be balanced, maybe only a damage bonus for weapons that overheat.
so your imagining Battle Front 1 A2Ging but this time if you touch an object like the groun or building you die. I beleive this to work inless the fighters have a higher flight ceiling. I also expect a pull back on R3 to slow, forward to accelirate or something (L3 to turn and all).
dang I really can`t wait till I get to try one of theese, maybe even see one in fighting gameplay. |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
37
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 04:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Kovak Therim wrote:Shouper of BHD wrote:
agreed except I`m guessing they are good tank destroyers/ HAV destroyers.... atleast 1 aircraft has to fill that role and dropship doesn`t seem like it does.
I'm thinking gunships would fill the HAV destroying role and be the most expensive to buy and the highest skill required to fly. - Launching in a fighter will also make you the target of every swarm launcher on the map. I think they'll be deathtraps, so they shouldn't be terribly expensive. Gunships kill ground troops and vehicles, dropships carry troops into battle, and fighters try to stop both of those from wreaking havok. Previous mentions of Fighters by the Devs have stated that they're far too fast for our current maps, and that they'd be "hitting the redline constantly". I don't think Swarm Launchers are going to be much of a threat.
oh, I was expecting that I would have to learn a dodging technuiqu, I`ve been practicing in my dropship (with succsess). well hopefully they have slown them down, otherwise I`m not going to be a fighter pilot oftenly  |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
37
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 05:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Shouper of BHD wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Kovak Therim wrote:Shouper of BHD wrote:
agreed except I`m guessing they are good tank destroyers/ HAV destroyers.... atleast 1 aircraft has to fill that role and dropship doesn`t seem like it does.
I'm thinking gunships would fill the HAV destroying role and be the most expensive to buy and the highest skill required to fly. - Launching in a fighter will also make you the target of every swarm launcher on the map. I think they'll be deathtraps, so they shouldn't be terribly expensive. Gunships kill ground troops and vehicles, dropships carry troops into battle, and fighters try to stop both of those from wreaking havok. Previous mentions of Fighters by the Devs have stated that they're far too fast for our current maps, and that they'd be "hitting the redline constantly". I don't think Swarm Launchers are going to be much of a threat. oh, I was expecting that I would have to learn a dodging technuiqu, I`ve been practicing in my dropship (with succsess). well hopefully they have slown them down, otherwise I`m not going to be a fighter pilot oftenly Oh hell no, hopefully they just open the whole map up to us. Actually, I had a thread a little while back that suggested that all forms of fixed-wing aircraft have access to the entire district, and be able to provide support in all battle-zones of the district, since as you can see in EVE, even the fullest extent of our current maps barely accounts for a fraction of a district.
sounds like this will be fun, I think I was thinking Star Hawk when dodging came into mind. Also do you think the planes can out fly/run small AND large missle turrets, I saw a video for a HAV with a hybrid missle turret and it had a lock on. |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
37
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 21:31:00 -
[9] - Quote
a bump is needed. |
Shouper of BHD
Better Hide R Die
37
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 22:15:00 -
[10] - Quote
THANKS VERY MUCH! that also answers the other threads questioned, I`ll go repost this vid their. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|